open-source-energy.org › OPEN-SOURCE-ENERGY.ORG › Open Source Threads - POST ANYTHING RELATED! v
1966 Battery Technology

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1966 Battery Technology
08-13-2012, 11:50 AM
Post: #1
Blazer Offline
Member
***
 		Posts: 122
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 2
1966 Battery Technology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r95OI0rD7Dk Maybe I missed this somewhere but what is the downside here?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-16-2012, 06:34 AM (This post was last modified: 08-16-2012 06:36 AM by ~Russ/Rwg42985.)
Post: #2
~Russ/Rwg42985 Offline
Administrator
*******
 		Posts: 1,762
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 15
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
(08-13-2012 11:50 AM)Blazer Wrote:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r95OI0rD7Dk Maybe I missed this somewhere but what is the downside here?

the only thing your missing is that we are still driving on gas and we all still relay on money... lol

here is there site:

http://www.electricauto.com/

~Russ

PS. we still need energy to charge the car... and fuel cell tech is not all that it is cracked up to be...
"I had to go to a source of power greater than Stan Meyer in order to try and bring in this form of technology. And the Lord said that this knowledge of pertaining to water when he was talking to Job and he asked Job the question. He said, "Job have you ever considered the treasures of snow or have you ever considered the treasures of Hell which I have reserved against the time or trouble against battle and war". And the reason I am here today is that the multi international corporate structures can't bring in this type of technology, the Federal governments cannot bring in this technology, it has to come through an individual such as myself and it has to move through you and I. So as I impart this technology onto you, then you have a responsibility to it. This technology must get in through the people or otherwise it will not go forward." - Stan Meyer

"We can demonstrate the technology. We can say it’s here but in actuality it will not be Stan Meyers to bring it in. It will be either you or I, the guy down the street, who will come together to bring it in. Otherwise, I do not believe an alternate energy source, whether water fuel cell or other, would ever come in. It’s going to have to be mandated by the people to try to reverse the environmental problems, the environmental damage, that’s actually occurring. - Stan Meyer, 1997"

"If you believe, even tho you can not see, you will see." ~Russ Gries
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-16-2012, 04:34 PM
Post: #3
Jeff Nading Offline
Posting Freak
*****
 		Posts: 1,707
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 11
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
Well we really need free energy, I personally would not want batteries, I would have to replace for $6000.00 when they wear out. Electric cars! -------- Ok, but free energy to run them.
As for most if not all of mans inventions and discoveries, we have or had to observe Gods Creation's, this in it'self proves he exists. Rom. 1:20. Have a good one, Jeff.Big Grin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-16-2012, 09:18 PM
Post: #4
firepinto Offline
Moderator
*****
 		Posts: 830
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 6
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission. Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first. It would always be an option down the road. It's a shame that the tower was never completed. An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate. No reliance on anyone, pure independence. Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.Tongue
Ideas are bullet proof.
[Image: sig.php?id=1286]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-06-2012, 10:23 PM
Post: #5
Jeff Nading Offline
Posting Freak
*****
 		Posts: 1,707
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 11
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
(09-06-2012 10:19 PM)DarcieGale Wrote:  I would have to replace for $6000.00 when they wear out. Electric cars! -------- Ok, but free energy to run them.

Those old battery's can be refurbished with alum, see lidmotors YT channel, ask him about John he does car battery's.Big Grin
As for most if not all of mans inventions and discoveries, we have or had to observe Gods Creation's, this in it'self proves he exists. Rom. 1:20. Have a good one, Jeff.Big Grin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2012, 03:27 PM
Post: #6
Lynx Online
Moderator
*****
 		Posts: 796
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 7
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
(08-16-2012 09:18 PM)firepinto Wrote:  I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission. Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first. It would always be an option down the road. It's a shame that the tower was never completed. An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate. No reliance on anyone, pure independence. Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.Tongue
Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc Cool
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2012, 07:13 PM
Post: #7
Jeff Nading Offline
Posting Freak
*****
 		Posts: 1,707
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 11
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
(09-07-2012 03:27 PM)Lynx Wrote:  
(08-16-2012 09:18 PM)firepinto Wrote:  I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission. Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first. It would always be an option down the road. It's a shame that the tower was never completed. An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate. No reliance on anyone, pure independence. Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.Tongue
Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc Cool
Just a small point, actually it was JP Morgan that pulled the funding from Tesla, Westinghouse bought some of Tesla's patents.
As for most if not all of mans inventions and discoveries, we have or had to observe Gods Creation's, this in it'self proves he exists. Rom. 1:20. Have a good one, Jeff.Big Grin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2012, 02:32 AM
Post: #8
Lynx Online
Moderator
*****
 		Posts: 796
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 7
RE: 1966 Battery Technology
(09-07-2012 07:13 PM)Jeff Nading Wrote:  
(09-07-2012 03:27 PM)Lynx Wrote:  
(08-16-2012 09:18 PM)firepinto Wrote:  I still think Tesla had it with the wireless power transmission. Even if the tower didn't produce free energy at first. It would always be an option down the road. It's a shame that the tower was never completed. An on board free energy device would still be the ultimate. No reliance on anyone, pure independence. Hopefully some day!

Also one should do some research on who "Apollo" really is, and decide if you really want to buy a product with one his names on it.Tongue
Tesla had a hard time convincing Westinghouse about the advantages with his
wireless power transmission system, as he (Westinghouse) basically said
"Well, what's keeping the ones NOT subscribing to the system from tapping in
to it and basically just drain the power from it, without paying a cent?"
Hence, as Westinghouse was Tesla's financier, the tower wasn't finished.
I don't think Tesla had "free energy" as a goal per se, his vision was to provide
power to basically any vehicle anywhere wirelessly, thus bringing power to all
the World's corners, without the need for costly national grids, etc etc Cool
Just a small point, actually it was JP Morgan that pulled the funding from Tesla, Westinghouse bought some of Tesla's patents.
Okidok, my bad, thanks.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Paintable battery and other Battery Stuff... KevinW_EnhancedLiving 5 559 10-28-2012 12:35 AM
Last Post: whitenight639
  Open source technology license Major 2 406 09-18-2012 09:58 AM
Last Post: bussi04
  Geothermal Battery(s) - (Moved) FraterGrey 1 330 07-06-2012 03:06 PM
Last Post: FloatyBoaty

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)