Vortex Based Research - Coils & Testing (Part 2)

[admin]

The Coils and Testing Threads are really the same thing, just split to reduce load time.
(Part 2)

This a a micro star-ship coil. it is 3/8" OD











Here is a tiny Rodin coil. the wire is thinner than your hair!





Here is a couple of 1" star-ships coils. i have made a bunch of these.














Here is a couple of other starship coils i have made.








Here is a big HVTWRC.
















Here is a HVTWABHAC, in this photo there is only 2 of 10 windings.









This is a 3 point rodin style coil it has one wind on it.





Here is a big fat starship coil.







This is a star-challis coil, this one is a 36 point.








This is a 12 point star-challis coil.











Thanks,

~Russ Gries

[Casper]

Hey man, hopw life's treating you well! Have you done any more testing with the ABHA clad coil and the six-pilser yet? Im really exited to see how it will behave with sophisticated energizing Peace.

[~Russ/Rwg42985]

(09-05-2011 11:55 AM)Casper Wrote:  Hey man, hopw life's treating you well! Have you done any more testing with the ABHA clad coil and the six-pilser yet? Im really exited to see how it will behave with sophisticated energizing Peace.

well, with all the other projects the ABHA coil is on the shelf. but i have the Pulse Fire Box now to test the 6 channels with... so when i get time... i will try to finish it and see whats up!

thanks!

~Russ

[simondodd]

Hey guys, I have just built my first Star Chalice coil, (actually I built 2 but the first one wasn't tight enough.



I had a thought about bifiliar winding one of these... Do one layer of phase 1 and then 1 layer of the second phase 10 degrees clockwise from the start of the first phase leaving the third phase free as in the rodin coil...

Has this been done before?
Does that even make sense...?

[Jeff Nading]

(05-11-2012 05:44 PM)simondodd Wrote:  Hey guys, I have just built my first Star Chalice coil, (actually I built 2 but the first one wasn't tight enough.



I had a thought about bifiliar winding one of these... Do one layer of phase 1 and then 1 layer of the second phase 10 degrees clockwise from the start of the first phase leaving the third phase free as in the rodin coil...

Has this been done before?
Does that even make sense...?

PM firepinto, I think he will be able to answer your question, Jeff.

[firepinto]

(05-12-2012 08:42 AM)Jeff Nading Wrote:  

(05-11-2012 05:44 PM)simondodd Wrote:  Hey guys, I have just built my first Star Chalice coil, (actually I built 2 but the first one wasn't tight enough.



I had a thought about bifiliar winding one of these... Do one layer of phase 1 and then 1 layer of the second phase 10 degrees clockwise from the start of the first phase leaving the third phase free as in the rodin coil...

Has this been done before?
Does that even make sense...?

PM firepinto, I think he will be able to answer your question, Jeff.

I'm not sure if that has been done before. I actually haven't tried making a star chalice coil. It's worth a try to experiment and see if there is different results.
I mostly messed around with rodin style windings in a different type of multiplication table sequence. You can see what I did here:
http://www.firepinto.com/rodin_coils.html
http://www.firepinto.com/rodin_math.html

Nate

[~Russ/Rwg42985]

(05-11-2012 05:44 PM)simondodd Wrote:  Hey guys, I have just built my first Star Chalice coil, (actually I built 2 but the first one wasn't tight enough.



I had a thought about bifiliar winding one of these... Do one layer of phase 1 and then 1 layer of the second phase 10 degrees clockwise from the start of the first phase leaving the third phase free as in the rodin coil...

Has this been done before?
Does that even make sense...?

these coils seem to be better as a pickup coil than an output coil...

i have done bifilir starship with an offset of 10 degrees.

i have built a bifilar with no offset on a Star Chalice coil. was going to use it as a dubble pulse coil...

all depends on the application!

build, test, post, learn!

~Russ

[Frank Grimes]

just subscribing. I hope someone can help me figure out how to subscribe to a thread without posting a message. The program doesn't seem to let me do that.

[Jeff Nading]

(12-15-2012 10:07 AM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  just subscribing. I hope someone can help me figure out how to subscribe to a thread without posting a message. The program doesn't seem to let me do that.

Hi Frank, look at the lower left corner of the thread your on, there will be a selection to subscribe, click on that, then you will be subscribed.

[Frank Grimes]

(12-19-2012 08:55 AM)Jeff Nading Wrote:  

(12-15-2012 10:07 AM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  just subscribing. I hope someone can help me figure out how to subscribe to a thread without posting a message. The program doesn't seem to let me do that.

Hi Frank, look at the lower left corner of the thread your on, there will be a selection to subscribe, click on that, then you will be subscribed.

Yes, I've tried doing that. I get some kind of incompatible message. My work-around has been to post a message, which then causes me to be become subscribed. I have also figured out that I can go back and delete the meaningless message, and still remain subscribed to the thread. I just can't figure out why the "subscription" link doesn't work directly. Anyway, I am managing to get subscribed to all the topics which interest me. Thanks much for responding.

PS Here's the exact message: Authorization code mismatch. Are you accessing this function correctly? Please go back and try again.

I always get that message when I click on the link to subscribe to a thread without posting a message.