open-source-energy.org

oh come on, that is the least convincing version i have ever seen

*searches his youtube downloads folder for "gate" *.

il show you my favorite one if my computer dosnt crash

awww sorry, must be called something else,  - but please enjoy this.,


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Z_wOMIf44

Flack finally found what i was looking for ;-DD smiles. happy days.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRzeSeSksG0

hmm it was linked too this one, - perhaps same thingymaboob

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3GuD-Q4hts

PopScan1,

It has been proven that "movement" to overcome a small area will make the machine work, aka "V magnet"...it's the automation and getting past this equalized, magnetic force that is the hold up.  You can see the movement with your hand to "adjust" the field and allow it to continue. 


Patrick1, 
The second video looks convincing... as does the last.   The others have been confirmed "not self running".... I'm sure they all have been confirmed, just I haven't seen the detials.


I think I have a new hobby now.... ;)
W.

All you need is:



You might recognize this as a Halbach array which gives you essentially a magnetic diode.   :-)

Thank you :thumbsup:

wd cool thread.

It gets cooler...

https://ie.energy/

So their machines are not for sale just yet, correct?
I see that they're open for investors though.
Well if this ain't cool I don't know what is..........provided they have what they say they have.
Extremely interesting, thanks for sharing :thumbsup:

And the hits keep coming....



Article on Focused Magnetics.

Claims double the torque and horsepower for the same amount of energy consumed.  Connect it to an efficient generator and that baby should loop with power to burn.

Patents

Very true.
If this motor indeed produces twice the power as compared to a conventional motor, it should loop just fine.

And that would be the open question.  It's only a claim.  I haven't seen any definitive proof defending that claim.

Which to me opens another question:  What fundamental flaw exists in a conventional motor that caps efficiency at 746 watts to one horsepower?   And why does a typical generator seem to have the same conversion ratio?  Is it truly a matter of waste heat, wasted force or something else?

errr sorry i meant too post ;

rofl

boy do i have some back emf tonite

well... that's all very interesting Matt.

https://ie.energy/about.html

That kinda explains some stuff...

Tell me... what is a imbalanced magnet?

~Russ

Some wild guy in Vegas mentioned to me that attaching a magnet to a large piece of steel spreads out one of the poles so it is no longer a focused, concentrated field.  Which apparently turns out to be the same thing as magnetic shielding.  The pole is still there, but so spread out you can hardly detect it.

Then we also learned from SuperMagnetMan if you quash one pole, effectively the other pole goes away too.

So to get imbalance it's really a matter of field density--focus one pole while dispersing it's opposite pole.

In the case of the Earth Engine, it looks to me like you want the two magnets to have widely dispersed fields when they approach each other and as they cross, then you want highly focused fields of like poles to create strong repulsion.  Still not real certain about the triggering Dennis uses, but I suspect it pushes the two magnets past the "sticky section" and apparently it requires only a small fraction of input energy compared to the total torque generated from the repulsion.

oh, interesting...

I guess something like this.

https://www.kjmagnetics.com/thickness.calculator.asp

but who knows...

~Russ

Hey Russ, do you think i would be able too use that on my newman machine ?. - and like just have non magnet material in the middle ?

IE just have a pole on each end, and metal bloocking the oopposide field,  in order too extend the rotor, with non magnetic material ...  ever test anything like that ? ;)