There is no 'victory' Cycle. This is not a point scoring exercise where you and I gain credibility based on our ability to ridicule one another or prove each other right or wrong. I'm waging my understanding of the Universe against yours, you use mathematics and i'm saying mathematics is flawed. The reason i'm saying they are flawed is because all the calculations are based on instruments build by your nervous system to make your nervous system feel happy.
No, the equipment is designed to most-efficiently collect data. The state of our nervous system doesn't enter into the equation. That straw man of yours has yet again crumpled to the ground before you got a chance to kick it down and declare 'victory'. :P
Yes, there is. That you persist in claiming otherwise is the reason why you've been led into the brambles of mysticism and pseudoscience crackpottery.
if your senses are making 5hit up or not presenting the evidence correctly them you are screwed. Don't say your senses can't make 5hit up because every night when you go to bed and dream, they make lots of 5hit up.Never said that. I said that the Universe is in superposition, all of it.
Define "superposition", Nav, or admit you're merely throwing out key words and tricky phrases as means of attempting to appear to know what you're talking about.
I said that the Universe is economical, why play a film when no one is watching? I said that the entire Universe exists as a wave function that cannot manifest into matter without a nervous system.
And you're wrong. You're essentially claiming the universe is sentient, and knows when and where someone is looking, so that it can instantaneously create the matter the person is looking at, preserving the state of that matter from the last time it was looked at while taking into account any evolution of state over the time that matter wasn't looked at. That's not totally insane, not at all.
So if no one is looking at the moon, there are no tides because the moon doesn't exist... right, Nav? :rofl2:
If no one is looking at the sun, our planet flies off into space because the sun's gravity no longer exists because the sun doesn't exist... right, Nav? Save us, Nav! Keep staring at the sun! :rofl2:
Humans are made of matter
, Nav, as are all intelligent beings currently known. How did matter
come into existence without intelligent beings, who consist of matter
, being there to cause that matter
to come into existence, per your fairy-tale?
Are you going to yet again claim the universe itself is intelligent, and went back through time to create humans so that matter could exist, Nav? :rofl:
If you want my real explanation of how it works i'll tell you, as long as you understand that is is a thesis, not right or wrong, just a thesis. Mathematical explanations are also a thesis when we start talking about creation and the like, true - mathematics on Earth are real, Newtonian mechanics are real, we build bridges by them, Einstein and Maxwell have contributed mathematics that are real here on Earth and we build nuclear devices out of that knowledge. Lots of physicists and mathematicians dating back to Aristotle and Pythagoras have been correct and we build the world we live in around them as well as others. I'm not tearing down human achievement, we've actually done quite well out of it.
I just don't subscribe to mathematicians calculating the Universe without the full set of cards and coming out with garbage such as dark matter and dark energy when the calculations go pear shaped.
If you think i'm googling the speed of light through a vacuum then your wrong, i've givn you my answer to the best of my ability and if its wong then its wrong. I'm 5hit at math anyway.
Then you have no way of determining whether you're right or wrong, given that you refuse to engage in the mathematics which would prove you right or wrong, Nav.
In fact, we didn't even get to the mathematics part... I'm merely asking you to state the exact value of a well-known universal constant in SI units.
So your fundamental misunderstanding of how the universe works goes far deeper than merely mathematics, it goes down into misunderstanding the physical constants which have been empirically obtained and mathematically corroborated. That's a profound misunderstanding. I suggest you start correcting that lack of knowledge on your part... unless you want to admit you're more comfortable being mired in mysticism and prefer not to actually know about reality... in which case, why are you here on this forum?