The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017

Cycle

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1650,  »Last edited by Cycle
Quote from onepower on November 9th, 2017, 11:15 AM
In fusion/fission the heavy elements were formed in stars from lighter elements under intense heat and pressure not unlike fossil fuels. The stars gave up energy to transform matter and when we produce fusion/fission we are simply releasing this same energy produced millions and millions of years ago in some far off star. Thus we can begin to see energy is energy, it is not created or destroyed only transformed.
No. One is a chemical process, the other is a nuclear process.

The mass of a  nucleus is less than the sum of it constituent nucleons. For the same number of free protons and neutrons as exist in a nucleus, the total mass of the individual nucleons is greater than that of the nucleus. The difference in mass between the products and sum is known as the mass defect. It is quite literally the physical manifestation of Einstein's mass-energy equation:
E2 = p2c2 + m2c4

The binding energy is the amount of energy required to break the nucleus into protons and neutrons again; the larger the binding energy, the more difficult it is. It can be considered a remnant of the Color Force (what used to be known as the Strong Force before quarks and gluons were discovered... the force which binds quarks via gluons inside a nucleon), extending outside the nucleon into inter-nucleon space. It is otherwise known as the Residual Strong Force, the Nuclear Force or the Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction.



Thus, stars do not "give up energy to transform matter", they transform energy from one form to another (remember, matter is merely another form of energy). A star trades gravitational potential energy (pressure) for nuclear binding energy, which generates higher atomic-weight atoms (via nuclear transmutation), neutrinos and photons (which generate heat).

As one goes up the Periodic Table, one finds that the nuclear binding energy comes closer and closer to the actual mass of the nucleons as one gets closer to iron.

Fe (iron) being at the bottom of the Segre Chart's Valley of Stability (the nuclear binding energy exactly equals the nucleon mass), no energy can be derived by either fissioning or fusing iron. Either one will require an energy input, and will thus result in nuclei with nucleons which are more tightly bound (less mass per nucleon).

The binding energy is associated with fusion and fission. Elements atomically lighter than Fe will release energy via fusion, while elements atomically heavier than Fe will release energy via fission.

Further, there is no evidence that CO2 causes global warming (remember, an efficient IR absorber is also an efficient IR emitter), and physics tells us that it causes cooling:
1} How increasing CO2 leads to an increased negative greenhouse effect in Antarctica

2} Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission

3}
Note that CO2 causes cooling throughout the entire depth of the atmosphere, except for a very slight amount of warming at the tropopause.

4} https://principia-scientific.org/the-four-known-scientific-ways-carbon-dioxide-cools-earth-s-climate/

The warmists have it exactly backward.
They have reversed cause and effect. I notice they tend to do this quite frequently. I sometimes wonder if they do so intentionally as means of advancing their political agenda.

They are arguing that photons which correspond to a black-body temperature of ~-80 C (193.15 K) are causing the atmosphere at an average temperature of ~14.85 C (288 K) to heat up. This violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

The warmists have constructed a very complex fantasy about how CO2 causes global warming... so complex that they probably never thought anyone would catch on to the very-well-hidden violation of 2Lot (2nd Law of Thermodynamics).

Let’s do a gedanken experiment:
—————
CO2’s ~15 micron absorption spectrum corresponds to a blackbody temperature of ~-80 C, which makes that an extremely low-energy (long wavelength) regime. It also happens to be a relatively energy-sparse region of the blackbody curve, given that there's not a lot of matter radiating at ~-80 C.

So which do you think is more likely:

1} That CO2 is absorbing extremely low-energy photons, increasing its vibrational quantum state (and thus its collisional radiationless transition probability... because remember, for collisional radiationless transition to have a very high probability, the molecule must be highly excited... as you can see from the UMLT monoatomic oxygen in this study...
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2006JA011736
...such that it’s transferring its vibrational quantum state energy to the translational kinetic energy of other molecules...

or...

2} Other molecules with a much higher-energy (shorter wavelength) absorption spectrum absorbing photons of a higher energy level than that which CO2 can absorb, becoming vibrationally excited then transferring that energy to and via collision with CO2, which then undergoes emission relaxation by emitting a 15 micron photon (as outlined in the study I cited prior:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2006JA011736

{HINT: #2 is the correct answer.}

In arguing for their position, the warmists are essentially arguing that energy is flowing from a lower-energy to a higher-energy regime... I think you can see the problem in that, yes? It's a very sneaky and round-about way of violating 2Lot. Energy cannot flow from a lower-energy regime to a higher-energy regime.

There are four forms of energy associated with atoms
and molecules:
1} Electron quantum state (quantized potential energy)
2} Vibrational state (quantized kinetic energy)
3} Rotational state (quantized kinetic energy)
4} Translational energy (unquantized kinetic energy, the only energy which we can measure as temperature)

The time-independent Schrodinger equation treats translational kinetic energy separately from electron quantum state, vibrational quantum state and rotational quantum state because translational energy is the only energy which is not quantized.

Remember back when they claimed that CO2 would cause stratospheric warming? That was because they were claiming that CO2 was absorbing a photon, increasing its vibrational quantum state, then transferring that vibrational (kinetic) energy to other molecular constituents of the atmosphere in the form of translational energy (the only form of molecular energy which we can measure as temperature). Since that sort of energy transfer has a probability distribution which depends upon molecular abundance, pressure and excitation level, it generally only happens at certain altitudes. The warmists were claiming it happened in the stratosphere, but empirical observation proved them wrong.

When no stratospheric warming was empirically observed (indeed, the stratosphere cooled), they then switched to claiming that CO2 would cause the stratosphere to cool (to come into line with empirical observation), but it would cause the troposphere to warm... by the very same collisional radiationless transition mechanism... but they forgot that the wide absorption spectrum of water in the troposphere precludes there being many sufficiently energetic photons in the troposphere to sufficiently excite CO2’s vibrational quantum state to make the collisional radiationless transition probability very high. And they forgot that energy cannot flow from a lower-energy to a higher-energy regime... that violates 2LoT.

In reality, the reverse happens throughout the atmosphere (the process shown in the UMLT (upper mesosphere, lower thermosphere) in the above-cited study)... other molecular constituents absorb higher-energy photons, become vibrationally excited and transfer that energy to CO2 via collisional radiationless transition, whereupon CO2 undergoes emission relaxation by emitting a 15 micron photon.

We know that CO2 is not undergoing collisional radiationless transition and thereby increasing the translational kinetic energy of other molecules because the emission spectrum for CO2 is sharply defined, not a quasi-continua:
Quote from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision-induced_absorption_and_emission
"Molecular fly-by collisions take little time, something like 10-13 s. Optical transition of collisional complexes of molecules generate spectral "lines" that are very broad - roughly five orders of magnitude broader than the most familiar "ordinary" spectral lines. The resulting spectral "lines" usually strongly overlap so that collision-induced spectral bands typically appear as continua (as opposed to the bands of often discernible lines of ordinary molecules)."
So in fact, other molecular constituents of the atmosphere absorb radiation at a region of the blackbody curve which is higher-energy and less-sparse, become vibrationally excited, collide with CO2, the CO2 becomes excited and emits a low-energy ~15-micron photon.

Given that the mean free path length for the IR emitted by CO2 increases with increasing altitude, the net vector for that emitted IR is upward.

That’s why CO2 has been shown to cause cooling throughout the atmosphere, except for a very slight amount of warming at the tropopause:



You’ll further hear warmists talking about increasing CO2 atmospheric concentration causing a widening of the ‘shoulders’ of the purported absorption band of CO2... but take a look at the image above.

You are looking downward on those 'shoulders', and you can see that CO2 causes cooling... so a widening of those 'shoulders' as CO2 atmospheric concentration increases means it’ll cause cooling at a wider band of frequencies. And as CO2 atmospheric concentration increases, you’ll see the center of that rainbow of colors labeled ‘CO2’ go toward even more extreme cooling.

This utterly destroys the entire underlying basis for CAGW. It cannot continue to exist as a reasonable hypothesis. It has been nullified.

Thus dies CAGW… in reality, CO2 causes global cooling (see studies referenced above), and more of it will cause more global cooling.

So CO2 acts as a negative feedback to the completely natural warming the planet had recently experienced. That forcing has ended, the planet is now cooling (in fact, at the fastest rate in recorded history), and as CO2 atmospheric concentration continues to increase, it will exacerbate the cooling.

That's why the planet never went into runaway warming back when CO2 levels were as much as 20 times higher than today, and in fact when CO2 concentration was that high, an ice age started. That ice age lasted until the CO2 had sufficiently rock-weathered out of the atmosphere to allow warming.

People have been lied to in order to further a political agenda. For some people, acknowledging that reality is far more painful than continuing to believe the lie of Catastrophic CO2-induced Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW).

securesupplies

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1651,  »
Newman with some sort of gas cylinder believed to be helium
Knowledge is power literally

Have a Great Christmas and New Year

~Russ

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1652,  »
Chears.

~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1654,  »
So it starts...

Testing lamanations...

3mil it is... left on tape..

30 awg bifilar

~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1655,  »
32 done... start goal is 50, total is 100...

4 wires on each coil... striping and terminating... going to be FUN

~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1656,  »
More...

patrick1

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1657,  »
Neat Replcation Buddy, - however it really looks like your taking the thing in a different direction too newman,

---   im happy with the basic operation of mine . question is, how too make it better, - unfortunately, magnets and size still seem the limitating factor of mechanical output,  -- however the BEMF and RF are promising also,

Will post some pictures of my machine shortly.

- im trying the low voltage route, with diodes.  H bridge.

cant wait too see how you go with a super high voltage , commutator route.

smiles  . currently i have death magnets, - ... good,   next im trying some 250mm subwoofer magnets ;-)-   need a better level angle on the output i thinkx

~Russ

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1658,  »
Oh man...

Ran them through the lamanatior a second time and cur them all out so they can be termanated...

So much work.  But so got to do it...

~Russ

Matt Watts

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1659,  »
TOO MANY WIRES !!!

 :rofl2:

 :imsorry:

There's no way I could keep track of all that Russ.  Glad it's you; not me.  :-)

namirha


Matt Watts

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1661,  »
Quote from namirha on December 21st, 2018, 02:38 AM
And even the very hairs of your head are all numbered.
And that number decrements by the hour.   :rofl2:

~Russ

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1662,  »
Good stuff guys!! Nice quote!! My favorite book!

Did a few tests and now its time to get to cracking on those wires...

~Russ

An interesting note.  With 3 coils i was able to get more voltage induced in the coil than i was putting in....

A sign of good hope.
But so much more to do.
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1663,  »
Quote from patrick1 on December 19th, 2018, 02:08 AM
Neat Replcation Buddy, - however it really looks like your taking the thing in a different direction too newman,

---   im happy with the basic operation of mine . question is, how too make it better, - unfortunately, magnets and size still seem the limitating factor of mechanical output,  -- however the BEMF and RF are promising also,

Will post some pictures of my machine shortly.

- im trying the low voltage route, with diodes.  H bridge.

cant wait too see how you go with a super high voltage , commutator route.

smiles  . currently i have death magnets, - ... good,   next im trying some 250mm subwoofer magnets ;-)-   need a better level angle on the output i thinkx
yeah, its really not a replication, its really just most of what i learned along the way all build in to one device...

--- what kind of RF have you gotten out of yours? yes mechanical output indeed need needs a good coupling and good magnets. this is why his long motor builds make a lot of sense.
looking forward to the photos.
what kind of wire / turns / magnets are you using?

low voltage is harder. as the one reason for the HV is to remove the IR^2 losses that the extra current gives you.

good stuff!

~Russ


Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1664,  »
Inching forward..

~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1665,  »Last edited
Lets see... where did we leave off...

Some more wire clean up and will be ready to start innerconectors...

Boy oh boy... 200wires officially terminated...

~Russ


https://youtu.be/jVM5qpVznE0

Matt Watts

The Energy Machine of Russ Gries 2019
« Reply #1667,  »
So if I'm understanding correctly, if you get the self resonant frequency below that of the rotor RPM, then the magnets themselves should assist in the rotation.  Have my fingers crossed you are correct.

Looking to see:

"The Energy Machine of Russ Gries 2019"

~Russ

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1668,  »Last edited
Quote from Matt Watts on January 4th, 07:58 AM
So if I'm understanding correctly, if you get the self resonant frequency below that of the rotor RPM, then the magnets themselves should assist in the rotation.  Have my fingers crossed you are correct.
yes, this is part of the goal. Theirs more details reasons WHY. as i touch on below.

"The Energy Machine of Russ Gries 2019"

Well will see about that... But none the less we will learn A LOT about this Principle. 

And why? Draw up the EMF and CEMF on a diagram... Draw the XC and XL on the same diagram...  where dose the CEMF land according to the EMF... its quite simple when you just look at the EMF and CEMF on inductors and capacitors on the same diagram and ask your self the correct questions....

When you reach a point.. you can turn a cap in to a motor, while doing more than you normal get it do with the same energy.... because why?

newtons third law dose not apply the same any more... and i truly believe that Newman was doing this with out fully understanding it... just my 2 cent.

for those interested go back and read my PDF... ( posted some where on this thread) There are some clues in there with out all the details... i need to do another wright up... making videos again as well... details will be in there. hop they help others understand this device.

~Russ
Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1669,  »
...

Lynx

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1670,  »
It's far more interesting to look at something hand-drawn as opposed to a printed ditto.
It's got more heart and soul to it..........looks almost like an ancient Egyptian hieroglyph too  :-D
Thanks for sharing Russ :-)

~Russ


patrick1

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1673,  »
The problem with newman motors, and transistors  , as i see it is.....

the h bridge circuit, is tricky because,

the main transistors base signal, comes through a smaller collector > emmiter transistors which is in a darlington pair arrangement.

x4

so when the motor rotates, it generates a voltage, which during half cycle, travels backwards through the top 2 transistors causing them damage,

and this also happens with the bottom transistors (however we can solve this with an extra diode).  -

so in relation too the top 2 transistors, -  i have managed too ignore the problem, and run the motor successfully up too 400volts.... but after this, even my 3998, 1500v transistors bite the dust.

so what i am doing now,  is running each of the mutual collectors, and darlington pairs,  from a isolated power supply, too negate the above issue, -  BACK TOO blasted 9v batteries ;-D.... but it works, - now i can max out my hv power supply, and run it all the way up too 520,   - and i suspect even high ! (will upgrade the psu soon and find out )

and it runs better than a spark gap so far as i can tell, - less current, at the same voltage (because of gap interferance)... and seemingly no less power (although i cannot proove this yet).   but it seems the same.

exciting stuff woop woop,  -  so what i am working on today, is an "isolated power delivery system too some capacitors, which will hopfully replace the 9v batteries,...   i could use solar panels etc ;-D.  but really trying too use non polarised capacitors, and diodes, too create a isolation, that means, they can all share the same power supply, but not be common grounded ( - which is essential for the h bridge, and the grounds obviosly cannot be shared.


-0 will post a circuit diagram when im happy with it,

BTW what voltage is good for these high resistance motors ?....  russ looks like his trying too power high from lightning strikes,
PEACE>


~Russ

Re: The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman 2017
« Reply #1674,  »
Thanks Patrick. Will need to respond to your post. For now here is some data. ~Russ