Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"

~Russ

Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
«  »
 I was just thinking. But havent time to go read the papers again.

Stan often mentions this "electron bounce phenomenon"

Is this the "electrical cavataion" I have been thinking about.

Or somthing else.

If it is. Then it makes sence to the other ideas discussed in the "disruptive discharge" thred.

If it's not. Then it's...  Well not. Lol

~Russ

haxar

Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #1,  »Last edited
It is a phenomenon.

It is undefined, by current literature.

Data is required to describe *it*, the phenomenon.

~Russ

Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #2,  »
Quote from haxar on October 7th, 2017, 11:04 AM
It is a phenomenon.

It is undefined, by current literature.

Data is required to describe *it*, the phenomenon.
Stan describes it. That's what I'm saying. Dose he describe it.

I have to re read what Stan said  ezcatly .

~Russ

haxar

Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #3,  »
Here's this gem from Memo 427:
Quote
Resonant Charging Chokes ... Thereby, preventing coil-ringing during each pulse off-time ... allowing Electron Bounce Phenomenon (EbP) to occur without amp influxing within VIC Matrix Circuit (690) of Figure (7-8) as so governed by Circuit Resistance Equations (Eq. 9) which, in activated electrical-state, allows positive Voltage Pulse-Wave (583) to be duplicated in succession to form Voltage Pulse Train (66 - 583a xxx 583n), as illustrated in (770) of Figure (8-1). Opposite negative Voltage Pulse Train (67 - 602a xxx 602n) is similarly formed since "Electron Clustering Effect" (631) of Figure (7-9) produces a "Negative Electrical Voltage Intensity (67) in equal magnitude to the "Positive Electrical Voltage Intensity (66) during each/repetitious magnetic pulsecycle (Rp/71). Remember, Secondary Voltage pickup coil (52) of Figure (7-8) displaces and separates Resonant Charging Chokes (56/62) on opposite end of said Secondary Pickup Coil (52).
I'm sure that only happens with the diode on, with your research, which may describe it.

~Russ

Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #4,  »
With out amp influxing

So not alowing amps to rush in

Governd by resistance

Positive voltage pulse wave.

 "Electron Clustering Effect" aka charge on both plates. The reverse of a capacitor.

I think he talked more about the "electron bounce phenomenon" else where  as well.

Thanks for the post haxar. I'm only on my phone.

~Russ
Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #5,  »Last edited
I think I need a bigger chunck of that it starts to soon

". Resonant Charging Chokes ... Thereby, preventing coil-ringin... "

What about the chokes

I'll have to dig in to it later. At least it's noted.

haxar

Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #6,  »Last edited
Yep, I can't copy the page off the phone.

"Amp influx inhibit" is also known as "electron bounce phenomenon."

Only happens during pulsing.
Re: Thoughts about "electron bounce phenomenon"
« Reply #7,  »Last edited
The full paragraph:
Quote
Electrical Voltage-Pulse Wave-Transmission (583a xxx 583n), now formed, occurs along Electrical Conductance Zone (587) since applied Electrical Pulse Voltage amplitude (Vo – 64a – 64b – 64c – Vn) is time responsive (T1/T2a – T3 – T1/T2n) to incoming gated Voltage Pulse Frequency (49a xxx – 1’3 – xxx 49n). Each Voltage Pulse duration time-period (T1 on time) from start to finish is directly related to applied Voltage-Pulse Amplitude (Vo xxx Vn) and reoccurring Voltage Pulse Frequency (49a xxx 49n) forming “Unipolar Voltage Pulse-Wave” (583) from zero voltage ground state (Vo) to a predetermined Voltage Level ( xxx 64 x – 64y – 64z – Vn) on the leading edge of the Voltage Pulse-Wave (Vpa) and, then, reversing voltage up swing to drop on the trailing edge (Vpb), completing Voltage-wave (583). The newly established leading voltage edge (Vpa) and trailing voltage edge (Vpb) being uniform in shape/configuration since both Resonant Charging Chokes (56/Z2 – 62/Z3) resistive values are the same (Typically 11.6 k each) and incoming signal (49a xxx 49n) is electrically linked with Water-Gap Capacitor (Cp) of Figure (7-8) having dielectric liquid of Water (85) there between … Thereby, preventing coil-ringing during each pulse off-time … allowing Electron Bounce Phenomenon (EbP) to occur without amp influxing within VIC Matrix Circuit (690) of Figure (7-8) as so governed by Circuit Resistance Equations (Eq. 9) which, in activated electrical-state, allows positive Voltage Pulse-Wave (583) to be duplicated in succession to form Voltage Pulse Train (66 – 583a xxx 583n), as illustrated in (770) of Figure (8-1). Opposite negative Voltage Pulse Train (67 – 602a xxx 602n) is similarly formed since “Electron Clustering Effect” (631) of Figure (7-9) produces a “Negative Electrical Voltage Intensity (67) in equal magnitude to the “Positive Electrical Voltage Intensity (66) during :=ach/repetitious magnetic pulsecycle (Rp/71). Remember, Secondary Voltage pickup coil (52) of Figure (7-8) displaces and separates Resonant Charging Chokes (56/62) on opposite end of said Secondary Pickup Coil (52).
The paragraph missed a mention of the diode.

Further down...
Quote
Blocking Diode (618) functions as an “Electrical Isolator” that prevents electrical discharge of Dual Secondary Coil (616A / B) during applied Pulsing Operations (49a xxx 49n).
"Electron Bounce Phenomenon" only happens during pulsing, especially at the pulse off-time.

Then the diode should be included in the phenomenon, if it's not just the coils and water capacitor contributing to the phenomenon.