when a charged capacitor is discharged in to a empty capacitor, a lot of energy is lost.
I thought that those formulas must be incorrect.
eric p dollard said conductors are like mirrors.
so a resistor would be a bad conductor. a bad mirror. absorbing/transmuting some of the energy and reflecting the rest.
his big hint is volts per second.
you talking about the tempic field is starting to connect. some fields travel faster (in time) then the others.
... which radiates doughnut shaped waves, which are not time functions.
i need to check the inductance of two bifilar coils in series. it seems its acting funny. depending on how they are connected
I've been struggling with this same concept for days now. Can't figure out how to connect carc electrically since it is already connected magnetically. It can't be that difficult. I need another set of untainted eyes to look at it and tell me something I'm missing.
Curious Evo, your schematic looks like you have a feedback loop. What I'm interested in is if the feedback, being back EMF (cold electricity), tries to fight the forward EMF (hot electricity) from the DC power source. Or do the two EMFs seem to coexist peacefully together?
I was under the impression from other people's work, like Ruslan & Akula, that you had to feed the back EMF through a universal power supply in order to get hot electricity that you could then drive the whole the system with. Same as I suspect Nelson was working on in this video(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ0roz9qz0g). Also recall Nelson's first Radiant Box(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u81edIeqIY), actually two boxes--I think one of them is more of a power conditioner, cold to hot electricity.
No, I do not charge caps with the output, but I discharge caps to have output :) but that caps first need to be full :) is the reason to I say that systems have more that one stage and should not be understood like just one process, but a combination of several process.
Yes, I use nano-pulses but made by own design; their action is to create a heavy unipolar pulse that make a very sharp pulse in a coil in a combination of series/parallel resonance. That effect is managed by a parametric oscillator that regulate how stronger is the pulses applied to a coil and the frequency used. The pulses will increase in their intensity after some seconds system start working and charges start be collected in other stage of circuit, make pulses going stronger and stronger, oscillation after oscillation.
Hope my answers could help you about your doubts.
I wonder if we should follow along with Luc but use these pancake coils as the transmitter/receiver pairs...?
We for sure need parametric oscillation, that's a given. To get it, we need a summator. What is a summator?
It's an electrical circuit that takes as input two disparate power sources and combines them into a single output that is the sum total of the two inputs. Think of a big 12 volt lead acid battery combined with a little 1.5 volt penlight battery--you can't just wire them together.
The concept seems simple enough, but is actually more complex than I had initially thought. You cannot gang together two power sources because the stronger one will always try to reverse power the weaker one. I learned this when charging two capacitors in series with back EMF. Doesn't work the way we want at all.
So I'm proposing a possible solution here. We time slice and multiplex the two power sources.
Suppose we charge two capacitors with the two inputs up to a particular voltage level. One will charge faster than the other. When one of them is charged and the other is not, we fire the charged one into a coil/transformer like any common DC-2-DC converter based on some clock signal. So in this instance, the stronger input power predominately passes through the summator. So how do we get the weaker input power to contribute?
At some point the weaker power input will finally charge its capacitor up to the preset voltage level we have defined. When this finally happens, then and only then do we gang the two capacitors together and fire them both, giving us a power burst for that particular cycle.
The beauty of this concept is that the weaker and stronger sources can switch places. Initially the main power source would be considerably stronger than the feedback power source, but at some point the feedback would actually overtake the main power source--this is where OU operation would begin to take over.
Now that I know we can collect the back EMF while at the same time producing a magnetic field that will induce a current in a collector coil, I'm beginning to see how this could all work together. If we use the back EMF to drive the CARC coil, then take the power from the collector coil and feed the summator, that's one possible solution and probably the most likely to work. We will still need some sort of current limiting to put a cap on this feedback loop, otherwise it could take off and self destruct, which it should do left unchecked if we have everything right.
Anyway, I have something here to work on for a while that I'm pretty certain we are going to need in order to make this project a success. Nelson didn't explicitly tell us about it, let alone how to do it, so I'll work on a solution and put it through some paces to see if my idea will actually work as I envision it.
i can charge 2 series capacitors with b emf
so matt. maybe you got a bad connection?
I'm doing my back EMF tests with the side-by-side coils, power on each coil, switch in between, so that each half of the coil acts like a capacitor plate. Switch completes the circuit, high voltage lamp across the switch to collect the back EMF when the switch opens.
You can see the very faint glow of the lamp when the switch is not operating. When the switch is operating, the lamp lights brilliantly.
Have you tried just holding chunks of ferrite next to the coil to see if things move in the intended direction?
I have two flat ferrite ribbon cable EFI suppressors and when I put them next to my coil, I see no change whatsoever in the behavior.
I was hoping to see something, because if I did, I might go looking for some larger ferrite ring magnets to play with.
With no core you can increase the duty cycle too, up to some point where the magnetic field strength no longer intensifies. Once you add core material, this will change quite a bit I would expect.
To strengthen a magnetic field, you can increase the current and/or increase the number of turns, that's your only options. Adding a core will focus the flux lines into a particular space. The total magnetic field you generate won't actually get any stronger, it will just stay where you put it.
How this will effect your back EMF...? I'm not certain. Also not certain what you are trying to get the back EMF to actually do.
I fail to see how L1 and L2 can be one and the same switch
The L1 yellow ringing, its when the 40% duty cycle is off. Correct?
You collect the back emf from this L1 coil, but, its not a single back emf spike, it is ringing.
The ringing is positive and negative, so do you collect all the energy? or only half wave? (one or 2 diodes to the cap).
It seems a resistive load on L3 acts like a damper. So the current isnt big enough, strong enough or the resistance is to high, destroying the resonance.
The purple current, also looks like its at half the resonant frequency. So, probably tune it around 100khz and it will ring even bigger. producing a stronger output on L3.
Here is my Idea: we now use a L1 bifilar pancake coil with low inductance right? So it saturates quickly and gives a minimum back emf spark. I suggested a ferrite coating on the coil. But what if we use a "solenoid form" bifilar coil, with the diameter of the hole? And place it on top of L2, across the hole? Again, with ferrite paste on L1.
Since L1 is about the magnetic field, and the back emf produced, it should work better in solenoid form. its also easier to build. a ferrite (radio frequency Mn Zn Fe) core, with a bifilar wound coil around it, the size of the hole diameter of L2, Should produce a stronger magnetic field, a stronger back EMF. And the collapsing field is placed in the center of the L2 coil, supporting the field of L2
so its a time factor? being smart in the use of time?
the back emf pulse comes after the magnetic pulse that created it.
so to use time, its about storing the back emf into a capacitor and release it again at the next magnetic (current) pulse. to enlarge the total voltage at that point in time, and so produce a larger magnetic field...